How to Soothe Your Eyes and Your Eyestrain

Lord Of The Flies By William Golding - 1264 Words

Gone was a very action pact, exciting, and vigorous book. When I read Lord of the Flies I thought it was the best book ever, but that has changed. Gone was such an intriguing book because something like this could never happen in real life. I love books that could never happen in this world. When I was reading this book it felt like a dream. When I would go to sleep I was dreaming about the part I read, but the main character was me. One day everyone fifteen and older disappears. Then there is this giant dome cover a whole entire city. There was no phone or cable service and all the kids were in school. That is not the only weird thing about the book; some of the characters have power. Caine and Sam can shoot long beams out of their†¦show more content†¦I would need electronics because my younger brother would need something to do in the house. We would have an x-box so he could watch movies and play video games. Can goods a very long lasting food that we would have in our house. Medicine and water are supplied to keep are body health. The items that we have should supply us for at least two weeks. There are many reason I would want to go outside. There may be kids out there who would have different beliefs about what has happened. They might take this time to take out all their animosity on kids. They might use this period to show their preeminence. Other kids might accomplice with these kids because they think that they could protect them or they might think that they are cool. Gone and our world our sort of the same because of many things. In Gone there were kids who wanted to do the right things and other who wanted to do the wrong thing. Our world is analogous because there are those kids who would go into a grocery store and take something without paying and others would leave the money on the counter. There are kids who would run around throwing rocks at people, house, stores, and other things and then there are kids who would want to stop them, keep peace, and do the right thing. Michael Grant in this book makes everyone 15 and older disappear. What could Michael Grant be saying when this happens, does this mean the pa rents not necessarily any more or the children are being

Dystopia or Utopia Free Essays

First, in the book 1 984 by George Orwell, dyspepsia is shown right off by the futuristic setting. Orwell shows the theme dyspepsia with the futuristic setting in 1 984 by using the Thought Police and vaporization. The Thought Police are constantly monitoring the thoughts of Oceania citizens, to make sure they do not disobey ‘ ‘The Party’ or â€Å"Big Brother’. We will write a custom essay sample on Dystopia or Utopia or any similar topic only for you Order Now In the book it says several times â€Å"BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU! † (Orwell 3), this saying creates fear in the citizens, and reminds them they are always being watched by their government. They do this to make sure the current government will stay in control. If any citizen ever even thinks about going against or betraying â€Å"The Party’, they get vaporized immediately. Being vaporized means that they basically make the citizen completely disappear and they also make it seem like they never existed. The author causes the reader to be afraid by using these forms of technology that are impossible in our world currently; this enhances the theme of dyspepsia. The main character Winston Smith, is always fighting his urge to go against and betray â€Å"The Party’ because he knows what he consequence will be if he ever does betray them. This also greatly enhances the theme of dyspepsia in 1984. Second, the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury has an underlying theme of dyspepsia as well. When reading just the first few pages of this book, the reader can get a feeling of dyspepsia very quickly. One of the first things that makes the reader think this is, is the fact that the firemen in Fahrenheit 451 burn books, instead of putting out fires, like they do in our modern day society. This seems very strange to use because it is not what we are used to, UT this is a way the author enhances the theme of dyspepsia. We see this dyspepsia world through the eyes of the main character Guy Montage. He is one Of the firemen that burn books, and he Starts to question why he does this throughout the book, especially when he meets his new neighbor, Claries. She is a young girl that makes him think about the world in new ways and makes him wonder about his life, his ideals, and his own happiness. This is a quote from the book, ‘†Do you ever read any of the books you burn? † He laughed. â€Å"That’s against the law! † â€Å"Oh of course† (Bradbury 8). Montage is liking to Beauty, his boss about reading books. After this he takes an interest in reading and soon steals a book to read, instead of burning it. In this fictional world created by Bradbury, the reading of books is abandoned. If someone is caught with a book, they are sent to a mental hospital and their books are burned, or they are sentenced to death. This also enhances the theme of dyspepsia because the government does not want the people to know anything and only do what they want them too. Thirdly, the book Brave New World written by Aloud Huxley also has an underlying theme of dyspepsia. Most of the time there is a big difference between a utopia and dyspepsia, for some readers, this book can be seen as either. It is dyspepsia because the people are built in factories, rather than by human interaction, also in a child’s upbringing they go through conditioning. This is a quote from the book talking about conditioning ‘that is the secret of happiness and virtue- liking what you’ve got to do. All conditioning aims at that: making people like their inescapable social destiny’ (Huxley 16). Conditioning means that they are trained to dislike and like certain things. All of the people in the society think that things are perfect, until Bernard Marx comes along. As a baby Bernard received extra alcohol in his ‘baby bag†, and he is different than the rest of the people. He has only engaged with 3 women in a year, whereas most â€Å"normal† alphas engage 2-3 women per week. Another example of dyspepsia is the system of control in Brave New World is pleasure, and indulgence. Sex and drugs causes the people to be happy all the time, and this keeps them from ever going against the government. In other words, the government keeps all the citizens under the influence, and happy to intro them and get the citizens to do whatever they want them too. Others might say that these three books, 1984, Fahrenheit 451 , and Brave New World aren’t dyspepsia, but they are utopias. They might say that these worlds are perfect because everybody has a job, or that nobody is in poverty. They also might say this because you don’t hear of anyone getting killed, or anyone getting robbed. This might be true, but the cons of these societies outweigh the pros, therefore they should be considered Dyspepsia. The governments in all three of these books have way too much control, and have he people oppressed to get them to do anything they want, and to keep them from going against them. In conclusion, Dyspepsia is the word that comes to mind with the stories and political horrors with government control, politicians, and community leaders being those who are most opposed by the audience and the main characters in the stories throughout Brave New World, 1 984, and Fahrenheit 451. Dyspepsia is the opposite of utopia, which means a perfect society. Dyspepsia means an imperfect society. All three of these books have an underlying theme of dyspepsia. How to cite Dystopia or Utopia, Papers

Winners and Losers in EU Integration

Questions: 1. How far should the EU expand to incorporate its eastern and south-eastern neighbours? 2. Should EU try to build bridges with Russia and other former soviet republics along its eastern border? 3. Should EU set aside it reservations and speed up the process of accepting turkey as full member? 4. What are the business implications for the tensions in the eastern and south Eastern Europe? 5. Outline the most likely scenario for the development of the relations between the EU and its eastern and south eastern neighbours over the next ten or twenty years? Answer: 1. The relations between the countries in Eastern and South Eastern Europe with the European Union are generally positive but there are several problems to the incorporation of the states into the EU. There are new republics that have been constructed from Soviet Union and the change of borders led to the uneven distribution of different ethnic groups. This was previously suppressed by the sense of unity and national benefit but as there is separate countries with different agendas now the conflict has come to fore and the eruption of violence between nations of the region are not uncommon. Therefore, the relation of the countries in Eastern Europe with the ones in the EU is different (Black, 2010). Moreover, the economic condition of the countries and their development are too different from the member states to consider a union at this time. The EU should bide their time until the situation settles and the countries show gradual progress and development in the social and economic s cene. 2. In my opinion, the EU should not attempt to build bridges with Russia and other eastern European nations at this moment as the political situation in that region is still too volatile for them to attempt growth with the help of the EU. The gas line supplies to Ukraine and other ethnic reasons are causing severe tension in the region. This situation is not conductive of growth and prosperity that the countries of EU have in common (Lavenex, 1999). The economic condition and social progress are also vastly different from the countries in the EU so any attempt made to connect with these countries will be futile and has high chance of failure. Therefore, the EU should only try to build bridges with the countries that have similar level of progress and potential for development. The instability of the region is too big a gap that has to be bridged by effort for one side, although the value of positive relations is indisputable. 3. In my opinion the adoption of turkey into the European Union is only a matter of time and the current situation in the region has only a few minor barriers to the joining of the country into the EU. The matter of the turkeys consideration for adoption is subject to the records of human rights violation of the ethnic minorities and the somewhat developed economy along with the predominantly Muslim religion and culture that is vastly different from the other countries of the EU (Pond, 2002). There is also the point of Turkish domination of the northern Cyprus that is a point of contention between the countries. These barriers in my opinion can be easily overcome by the combined effort from the whole of the EU and the people of the country will benefit from the influence of the European Unions interference. Therefore, there are no reasons to slow down the growth of the country by the bureaucracy. 4. In the tensions of the Eastern Europe the business implications of the region are based on the ethnic conflicts that result in violent confrontations between ethnic groups. These conflicts cause instability in the market of the region and the rate of foreign direct investment in the countries allied with Russia are significantly lower than the countries that are more in favour of their western neighbours (Smith, 1999). This causes the trade imbalance between the nations of the region. The nations of the region were separated by the iron curtain during the soviet reign had not totally dissolved the trade barriers but the countries that are allied with the EU are benefitting to some degree by the influx of trade from their neighbours of western Europe. 5. In the next ten to twenty years the scenario in the Eastern and South Eastern Europe is liable to change dramatically. Already after disaster in the 1990 the countries in the region are shaping up nicely and in just ten years they were able to pick themselves back up from the disaster. Therefore, it can be hoped that the in the next ten or twenty years they will be completely stable and the conflicts that erupt unannounced will be quelled in the region. The peace will be followed by economic development and prosperity and rise in social standards (Tang, 2000). This will lead to more equality in the region and the countries in this region will be ready to form union with the western neighbours in the EU. Therefore, the current stance and rigidity of the EU will be reduced and the reasons for such mentality would have been eradicated by then. So in ten or twenty years there will a peaceful cooperation between the eastern and western European countries. References Black, R. (2010).A continent moving west?. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Lavenex, S. (1999).Safe third countries. Budapest: CEU Press. Pond, E. (2002).The rebirth of Europe. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Smith, K. (1999).The making of EU foreign policy. New York: St. Martin's Press. Tang, H. (2000).Winners and losers in EU integration. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Topidi, K. and Morawa, A. (2011).Constitutional evolution in Central and Eastern Europe. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub.